{"id":88468,"topic":"ai","source":"sohu.com","title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","url_hash":"cfbdb63444d68006819cd4380df3b3ffd98df0a6","author":"","summary":"<a href=\"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiiAFBVV95cUxPenlsTGF4TXV1TGxHU2s0V25mTlJscDhBajVBaENsaEE5LWhjRWpzUVVsQ2c5ejBGWkdpVkxDdDhDNGFVZHRFM0FHanhwMVZZZTFQR242LVNVR3dqLWQxYWYxWkVBUmxQeXA2N1E2NHJZVW5sRlVzMGJnNzIwVkQ1bmp1MmpfTHJW?oc=5\" target=\"_blank\">李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color=\"#6f6f6f\">sohu.com</font>","content":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于速度，更在于治理结构。\n独立评估是安全治理的基础\n李飞飞明确提出了一个关键判断：AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准。这触及当前AI安全治理的核心矛盾——开发企业掌握最直接的技术细节与运行数据，但企业内部的评测体系往往与商业目标深度绑定，难言完全中立。若安全评估仅由开发企业独自负责，可能削弱公众信任，也难以形成跨企业、跨行业的统一基线。\n独立机构与公共部门介入监督，并非否定企业的专业能力，而是为AI发展建立外部约束与共同规则。政府、行业和学术机构共同参与制定标准，有助于在安全、创新与社会价值之间取得平衡。","image_url":"https://q9.itc.cn/q_70/images03/20260923/e3b439725c684e8db301a8ad691a76fd.jpeg","lang":"zh","published_at":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","fetched_at":"2026-09-23T03:15:06+00:00","status":"read","starred":0,"extract_state":"ok","summary_auto":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","cluster_id":null,"extract_retries":0,"extract_error":null,"contract_version":"news_item.v1","format_contract_version":"news_item_formats.v1","dedup_url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}},"news_item":{"id":88468,"canonical_url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","source_url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","source_name":"sohu.com","author":null,"published_at":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","locale":"zh","topic":"ai","tags":[],"rss_summary":"<a href=\"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiiAFBVV95cUxPenlsTGF4TXV1TGxHU2s0V25mTlJscDhBajVBaENsaEE5LWhjRWpzUVVsQ2c5ejBGWkdpVkxDdDhDNGFVZHRFM0FHanhwMVZZZTFQR242LVNVR3dqLWQxYWYxWkVBUmxQeXA2N1E2NHJZVW5sRlVzMGJnNzIwVkQ1bmp1MmpfTHJW?oc=5\" target=\"_blank\">李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<font color=\"#6f6f6f\">sohu.com</font>","full_text":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于速度，更在于治理结构。\n独立评估是安全治理的基础\n李飞飞明确提出了一个关键判断：AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准。这触及当前AI安全治理的核心矛盾——开发企业掌握最直接的技术细节与运行数据，但企业内部的评测体系往往与商业目标深度绑定，难言完全中立。若安全评估仅由开发企业独自负责，可能削弱公众信任，也难以形成跨企业、跨行业的统一基线。\n独立机构与公共部门介入监督，并非否定企业的专业能力，而是为AI发展建立外部约束与共同规则。政府、行业和学术机构共同参与制定标准，有助于在安全、创新与社会价值之间取得平衡。","excerpt":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","extraction":{"state":"ok","confidence":0.9,"error":null,"explanation":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}}},"display_formats":["compact","card","full","digest_section","json"]},"daily_stack_record":{"title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","summary":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","source":"sohu.com","date":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","content":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于速度，更在于治理结构。\n独立评估是安全治理的基础\n李飞飞明确提出了一个关键判断：AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准。这触及当前AI安全治理的核心矛盾——开发企业掌握最直接的技术细节与运行数据，但企业内部的评测体系往往与商业目标深度绑定，难言完全中立。若安全评估仅由开发企业独自负责，可能削弱公众信任，也难以形成跨企业、跨行业的统一基线。\n独立机构与公共部门介入监督，并非否定企业的专业能力，而是为AI发展建立外部约束与共同规则。政府、行业和学术机构共同参与制定标准，有助于在安全、创新与社会价值之间取得平衡。","confidence":0.9,"diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","quality_bucket":"high","failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}},"tags":[]},"fallback_formats":["markdown","json","html"],"actions":{"read":"/item/88468","export_markdown":"/api/items/88468/export?format=markdown","export_json":"/api/items/88468/export?format=json","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334"},"formats":{"full":{"id":88468,"title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","source":"sohu.com","author":null,"published_at":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","locale":"zh","topic":"ai","tags":[],"excerpt":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","full_text":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于速度，更在于治理结构。\n独立评估是安全治理的基础\n李飞飞明确提出了一个关键判断：AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准。这触及当前AI安全治理的核心矛盾——开发企业掌握最直接的技术细节与运行数据，但企业内部的评测体系往往与商业目标深度绑定，难言完全中立。若安全评估仅由开发企业独自负责，可能削弱公众信任，也难以形成跨企业、跨行业的统一基线。\n独立机构与公共部门介入监督，并非否定企业的专业能力，而是为AI发展建立外部约束与共同规则。政府、行业和学术机构共同参与制定标准，有助于在安全、创新与社会价值之间取得平衡。","reading_time_min":1,"extraction":{"state":"ok","confidence":0.9,"error":null,"explanation":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}}},"quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}},"actions":{"read":"/item/88468","export_markdown":"/api/items/88468/export?format=markdown","export_json":"/api/items/88468/export?format=json","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334"}},"digest":{"id":88468,"title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","source":"sohu.com","topic":"ai","published_at":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","excerpt":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。 这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","quality_bucket":"high","quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","reading_time_min":1,"cluster_id":null},"card":{"display_title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","subtitle":"sohu.com · 2026-09-23","summary":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。…","badges":["quality:high"],"links":{"read":"/item/88468","original":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334"},"quality_warning":null},"export":{"title":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权 - sohu.com","url":"https://m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075?scm=10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","summary":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于…","source":"sohu.com","date":"2026-09-23T02:23:00+00:00","content":"李飞飞回应AI减速论战：人工智能关乎人类尊严与自主权\n斯坦福大学教授李飞飞在回应硅谷“AI减速”论战时表示，人工智能技术应接受独立机构及公共部门的进一步监督。她认为，AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准，安全评估不能仅由开发企业独自负责。\n这一发言将争议焦点从“是否减速”引向“由谁来评估、以什么标准评估”。在围绕前沿AI开发速度的辩论中，呼吁减速的一方与主张继续加速的一方各执一词，而李飞飞给出的判断是：问题不止于速度，更在于治理结构。\n独立评估是安全治理的基础\n李飞飞明确提出了一个关键判断：AI企业的内部评测无法替代政府、行业及学术机构制定的通用标准。这触及当前AI安全治理的核心矛盾——开发企业掌握最直接的技术细节与运行数据，但企业内部的评测体系往往与商业目标深度绑定，难言完全中立。若安全评估仅由开发企业独自负责，可能削弱公众信任，也难以形成跨企业、跨行业的统一基线。\n独立机构与公共部门介入监督，并非否定企业的专业能力，而是为AI发展建立外部约束与共同规则。政府、行业和学术机构共同参与制定标准，有助于在安全、创新与社会价值之间取得平衡。","confidence":0.9,"diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//m.sohu.com/a/1079821515_128075%3Fscm%3D10001.325_13-325_13.0.0-0-0-0-0.5_1334","quality_bucket":"high","failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 487 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221,"usable_text_length":487,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":487,"summary_length":221}},"tags":[],"format_contract_version":"news_item_formats.v1"}}}