{"id":50075,"topic":"ai","source":"GovTech","title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","url_hash":"fbf5e6bc73902cb6e913a44258eeb9d9871e0cbe","author":"","summary":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace GovTech","content":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment.\nSens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.\nBanks introduced the bill, known as the AI Workforce Projections, Research and Evaluations to Promote AI Readiness and Employment, or AI Workforce PREPARE Act, in December.\nAt a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s panel on Employment and Workforce Safety, which Banks chairs, he said that better data is a first step toward helping workers master skills needed “in the AI economy.”\n“Existing labor statistics too often fail to tell us how occupations’ tasks are changing, what skills are needed, which jobs will grow and shrink and how workers move through the labor force because of AI,” Banks said.\nThe bill would allow the Labor Department to hire experts in AI and require the department to set up an AI Workforce Research Hub, monitor how employees move between jobs impacted by AI and develop benchmarks to measure which tasks may be automated, requiring employees to be retrained.\nThe bill would also encourage companies to voluntarily share data on their adoption of AI. It would require employers to disclose if AI was a factor in a mass layoff.\nSens. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are also co-sponsors of the legislation.\nHickenlooper, who serves as ranking member of the panel, said in support of the bill that “informed policy starts with good data.”\nHe also said he’s working on another bill that he said would bring together “regional partnerships of educators, industry and intermediaries to provide credentials, apprenticeships, other … jobs and training that use AI,” to take advantage of expertise in a region’s workforce needs.\nHickenlooper said the bill would increase communication about forecasts for workforce needs in the age of AI, as well as strategies to respond.\nEXPERTS WEIGH IN\nThe subcommittee heard from a panel of experts who underlined the need for better data and explained possible changes beyond the bill.\nCarol Rogers, director of the Indiana Business Research Center, offered her support for Banks’ bill and urged the committee to “create standards for the definitions so that we compare apples to apples” in measuring AI’s impact on the workforce.\nLiya Palagashvili, director of the Labor Policy Project at the Mercatus think tank at George Mason University, said that measurement systems should be “resilient across several possible futures.”\nShe said that data on AI in the labor market could be improved by “linking business surveys’ answers to actual hiring and wage outcomes” to allow comparisons based on whether a firm uses AI.\nShe also encouraged lawmakers to add occupational data to wage records reported by employers “so we can see which specific jobs are growing or shrinking.” She also requested a “timely measure of new solo independent business activity” to measure whether AI is increasing that type of work.\nThe panel experts largely downplayed concerns about mass unemployment, instead focusing on how AI could change the skills workers need and how they acquire them.\nPalagashvili said that “early evidence does not yet show broad AI-driven employment loss.”\nShe said that current data on jobs for young workers in fields most exposed to AI is “more consistent with slower hiring than with layoffs” and that some of the slowdown may have begun before the release of major generative AI models, indicating that the hiring changes could be caused by other economic factors.\nKen Clark, president and CEO of workforce investment group EmployIndy, said that “AI is reshaping far more jobs than it’s replacing.”\n“The greatest long-term workforce risk is not widespread unemployment,” Clark said. “It’s the disruption of career pathways that workers rely on to gain experience and continually develop new skills throughout their careers.”\nJustin Heck, senior director of research and data production for skills-based hiring advocacy group Opportunity@Work, said that AI could also “hollow out” midlevel positions by removing friction points where employees learn necessary skills to move up in the workforce.\n“A company that automates the demanding parts of jobs may see short-term efficiency gains while inadvertently dismantling the pipeline that produces its own future supervisors and managers,” Heck said.\n©2026 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.","image_url":"https://erepublic.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/0420393/2147483647/strip/true/crop/2400x1167+0+0/resize/1440x700!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Ferepublic-brightspot.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fd0%2F0d%2F67ac6a984ba1ad74d228deb16826%2Fus-news-congress-ai-workforce-data-filepic-get.jpg","lang":"en","published_at":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","fetched_at":"2026-07-30T22:15:04+00:00","status":"read","starred":0,"extract_state":"ok","summary_auto":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.","cluster_id":null,"extract_retries":0,"extract_error":null,"contract_version":"news_item.v1","format_contract_version":"news_item_formats.v1","dedup_url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}},"news_item":{"id":50075,"canonical_url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","source_url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","source_name":"GovTech","author":null,"published_at":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","locale":"en","topic":"ai","tags":[],"rss_summary":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace GovTech","full_text":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment.\nSens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.\nBanks introduced the bill, known as the AI Workforce Projections, Research and Evaluations to Promote AI Readiness and Employment, or AI Workforce PREPARE Act, in December.\nAt a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s panel on Employment and Workforce Safety, which Banks chairs, he said that better data is a first step toward helping workers master skills needed “in the AI economy.”\n“Existing labor statistics too often fail to tell us how occupations’ tasks are changing, what skills are needed, which jobs will grow and shrink and how workers move through the labor force because of AI,” Banks said.\nThe bill would allow the Labor Department to hire experts in AI and require the department to set up an AI Workforce Research Hub, monitor how employees move between jobs impacted by AI and develop benchmarks to measure which tasks may be automated, requiring employees to be retrained.\nThe bill would also encourage companies to voluntarily share data on their adoption of AI. It would require employers to disclose if AI was a factor in a mass layoff.\nSens. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are also co-sponsors of the legislation.\nHickenlooper, who serves as ranking member of the panel, said in support of the bill that “informed policy starts with good data.”\nHe also said he’s working on another bill that he said would bring together “regional partnerships of educators, industry and intermediaries to provide credentials, apprenticeships, other … jobs and training that use AI,” to take advantage of expertise in a region’s workforce needs.\nHickenlooper said the bill would increase communication about forecasts for workforce needs in the age of AI, as well as strategies to respond.\nEXPERTS WEIGH IN\nThe subcommittee heard from a panel of experts who underlined the need for better data and explained possible changes beyond the bill.\nCarol Rogers, director of the Indiana Business Research Center, offered her support for Banks’ bill and urged the committee to “create standards for the definitions so that we compare apples to apples” in measuring AI’s impact on the workforce.\nLiya Palagashvili, director of the Labor Policy Project at the Mercatus think tank at George Mason University, said that measurement systems should be “resilient across several possible futures.”\nShe said that data on AI in the labor market could be improved by “linking business surveys’ answers to actual hiring and wage outcomes” to allow comparisons based on whether a firm uses AI.\nShe also encouraged lawmakers to add occupational data to wage records reported by employers “so we can see which specific jobs are growing or shrinking.” She also requested a “timely measure of new solo independent business activity” to measure whether AI is increasing that type of work.\nThe panel experts largely downplayed concerns about mass unemployment, instead focusing on how AI could change the skills workers need and how they acquire them.\nPalagashvili said that “early evidence does not yet show broad AI-driven employment loss.”\nShe said that current data on jobs for young workers in fields most exposed to AI is “more consistent with slower hiring than with layoffs” and that some of the slowdown may have begun before the release of major generative AI models, indicating that the hiring changes could be caused by other economic factors.\nKen Clark, president and CEO of workforce investment group EmployIndy, said that “AI is reshaping far more jobs than it’s replacing.”\n“The greatest long-term workforce risk is not widespread unemployment,” Clark said. “It’s the disruption of career pathways that workers rely on to gain experience and continually develop new skills throughout their careers.”\nJustin Heck, senior director of research and data production for skills-based hiring advocacy group Opportunity@Work, said that AI could also “hollow out” midlevel positions by removing friction points where employees learn necessary skills to move up in the workforce.\n“A company that automates the demanding parts of jobs may see short-term efficiency gains while inadvertently dismantling the pipeline that produces its own future supervisors and managers,” Heck said.\n©2026 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.","excerpt":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.","extraction":{"state":"ok","confidence":0.9,"error":null,"explanation":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}}},"display_formats":["compact","card","full","digest_section","json"]},"daily_stack_record":{"title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","summary":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.","source":"GovTech","date":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","content":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment.\nSens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.\nBanks introduced the bill, known as the AI Workforce Projections, Research and Evaluations to Promote AI Readiness and Employment, or AI Workforce PREPARE Act, in December.\nAt a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s panel on Employment and Workforce Safety, which Banks chairs, he said that better data is a first step toward helping workers master skills needed “in the AI economy.”\n“Existing labor statistics too often fail to tell us how occupations’ tasks are changing, what skills are needed, which jobs will grow and shrink and how workers move through the labor force because of AI,” Banks said.\nThe bill would allow the Labor Department to hire experts in AI and require the department to set up an AI Workforce Research Hub, monitor how employees move between jobs impacted by AI and develop benchmarks to measure which tasks may be automated, requiring employees to be retrained.\nThe bill would also encourage companies to voluntarily share data on their adoption of AI. It would require employers to disclose if AI was a factor in a mass layoff.\nSens. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are also co-sponsors of the legislation.\nHickenlooper, who serves as ranking member of the panel, said in support of the bill that “informed policy starts with good data.”\nHe also said he’s working on another bill that he said would bring together “regional partnerships of educators, industry and intermediaries to provide credentials, apprenticeships, other … jobs and training that use AI,” to take advantage of expertise in a region’s workforce needs.\nHickenlooper said the bill would increase communication about forecasts for workforce needs in the age of AI, as well as strategies to respond.\nEXPERTS WEIGH IN\nThe subcommittee heard from a panel of experts who underlined the need for better data and explained possible changes beyond the bill.\nCarol Rogers, director of the Indiana Business Research Center, offered her support for Banks’ bill and urged the committee to “create standards for the definitions so that we compare apples to apples” in measuring AI’s impact on the workforce.\nLiya Palagashvili, director of the Labor Policy Project at the Mercatus think tank at George Mason University, said that measurement systems should be “resilient across several possible futures.”\nShe said that data on AI in the labor market could be improved by “linking business surveys’ answers to actual hiring and wage outcomes” to allow comparisons based on whether a firm uses AI.\nShe also encouraged lawmakers to add occupational data to wage records reported by employers “so we can see which specific jobs are growing or shrinking.” She also requested a “timely measure of new solo independent business activity” to measure whether AI is increasing that type of work.\nThe panel experts largely downplayed concerns about mass unemployment, instead focusing on how AI could change the skills workers need and how they acquire them.\nPalagashvili said that “early evidence does not yet show broad AI-driven employment loss.”\nShe said that current data on jobs for young workers in fields most exposed to AI is “more consistent with slower hiring than with layoffs” and that some of the slowdown may have begun before the release of major generative AI models, indicating that the hiring changes could be caused by other economic factors.\nKen Clark, president and CEO of workforce investment group EmployIndy, said that “AI is reshaping far more jobs than it’s replacing.”\n“The greatest long-term workforce risk is not widespread unemployment,” Clark said. “It’s the disruption of career pathways that workers rely on to gain experience and continually develop new skills throughout their careers.”\nJustin Heck, senior director of research and data production for skills-based hiring advocacy group Opportunity@Work, said that AI could also “hollow out” midlevel positions by removing friction points where employees learn necessary skills to move up in the workforce.\n“A company that automates the demanding parts of jobs may see short-term efficiency gains while inadvertently dismantling the pipeline that produces its own future supervisors and managers,” Heck said.\n©2026 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.","confidence":0.9,"diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","quality_bucket":"high","failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}},"tags":[]},"fallback_formats":["markdown","json","html"],"actions":{"read":"/item/50075","export_markdown":"/api/items/50075/export?format=markdown","export_json":"/api/items/50075/export?format=json","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace"},"formats":{"full":{"id":50075,"title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","source":"GovTech","author":null,"published_at":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","locale":"en","topic":"ai","tags":[],"excerpt":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.","full_text":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment.\nSens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.\nBanks introduced the bill, known as the AI Workforce Projections, Research and Evaluations to Promote AI Readiness and Employment, or AI Workforce PREPARE Act, in December.\nAt a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s panel on Employment and Workforce Safety, which Banks chairs, he said that better data is a first step toward helping workers master skills needed “in the AI economy.”\n“Existing labor statistics too often fail to tell us how occupations’ tasks are changing, what skills are needed, which jobs will grow and shrink and how workers move through the labor force because of AI,” Banks said.\nThe bill would allow the Labor Department to hire experts in AI and require the department to set up an AI Workforce Research Hub, monitor how employees move between jobs impacted by AI and develop benchmarks to measure which tasks may be automated, requiring employees to be retrained.\nThe bill would also encourage companies to voluntarily share data on their adoption of AI. It would require employers to disclose if AI was a factor in a mass layoff.\nSens. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are also co-sponsors of the legislation.\nHickenlooper, who serves as ranking member of the panel, said in support of the bill that “informed policy starts with good data.”\nHe also said he’s working on another bill that he said would bring together “regional partnerships of educators, industry and intermediaries to provide credentials, apprenticeships, other … jobs and training that use AI,” to take advantage of expertise in a region’s workforce needs.\nHickenlooper said the bill would increase communication about forecasts for workforce needs in the age of AI, as well as strategies to respond.\nEXPERTS WEIGH IN\nThe subcommittee heard from a panel of experts who underlined the need for better data and explained possible changes beyond the bill.\nCarol Rogers, director of the Indiana Business Research Center, offered her support for Banks’ bill and urged the committee to “create standards for the definitions so that we compare apples to apples” in measuring AI’s impact on the workforce.\nLiya Palagashvili, director of the Labor Policy Project at the Mercatus think tank at George Mason University, said that measurement systems should be “resilient across several possible futures.”\nShe said that data on AI in the labor market could be improved by “linking business surveys’ answers to actual hiring and wage outcomes” to allow comparisons based on whether a firm uses AI.\nShe also encouraged lawmakers to add occupational data to wage records reported by employers “so we can see which specific jobs are growing or shrinking.” She also requested a “timely measure of new solo independent business activity” to measure whether AI is increasing that type of work.\nThe panel experts largely downplayed concerns about mass unemployment, instead focusing on how AI could change the skills workers need and how they acquire them.\nPalagashvili said that “early evidence does not yet show broad AI-driven employment loss.”\nShe said that current data on jobs for young workers in fields most exposed to AI is “more consistent with slower hiring than with layoffs” and that some of the slowdown may have begun before the release of major generative AI models, indicating that the hiring changes could be caused by other economic factors.\nKen Clark, president and CEO of workforce investment group EmployIndy, said that “AI is reshaping far more jobs than it’s replacing.”\n“The greatest long-term workforce risk is not widespread unemployment,” Clark said. “It’s the disruption of career pathways that workers rely on to gain experience and continually develop new skills throughout their careers.”\nJustin Heck, senior director of research and data production for skills-based hiring advocacy group Opportunity@Work, said that AI could also “hollow out” midlevel positions by removing friction points where employees learn necessary skills to move up in the workforce.\n“A company that automates the demanding parts of jobs may see short-term efficiency gains while inadvertently dismantling the pipeline that produces its own future supervisors and managers,” Heck said.\n©2026 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.","reading_time_min":4,"extraction":{"state":"ok","confidence":0.9,"error":null,"explanation":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}}},"quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}},"actions":{"read":"/item/50075","export_markdown":"/api/items/50075/export?format=markdown","export_json":"/api/items/50075/export?format=json","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace"}},"digest":{"id":50075,"title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","source":"GovTech","topic":"ai","published_at":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","excerpt":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add…","quality_bucket":"high","quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","reading_time_min":4,"cluster_id":null},"card":{"display_title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","subtitle":"GovTech · 2026-07-30","summary":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John…","badges":["quality:high"],"links":{"read":"/item/50075","original":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","diagnose":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace"},"quality_warning":null},"export":{"title":"Federal Bill Would Probe AI’s Use, Focus in the Workplace - GovTech","url":"https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","summary":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.","source":"GovTech","date":"2026-07-30T21:41:29+00:00","content":"That data could help back up what experts told a Senate subcommittee on Wednesday — that the biggest AI-fueled change may be different tasks at work rather than mass unemployment.\nSens. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., urged support for their bill that would add questions to federal surveys about how AI is used in the workplace and which occupations are most impacted.\nBanks introduced the bill, known as the AI Workforce Projections, Research and Evaluations to Promote AI Readiness and Employment, or AI Workforce PREPARE Act, in December.\nAt a hearing of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee’s panel on Employment and Workforce Safety, which Banks chairs, he said that better data is a first step toward helping workers master skills needed “in the AI economy.”\n“Existing labor statistics too often fail to tell us how occupations’ tasks are changing, what skills are needed, which jobs will grow and shrink and how workers move through the labor force because of AI,” Banks said.\nThe bill would allow the Labor Department to hire experts in AI and require the department to set up an AI Workforce Research Hub, monitor how employees move between jobs impacted by AI and develop benchmarks to measure which tasks may be automated, requiring employees to be retrained.\nThe bill would also encourage companies to voluntarily share data on their adoption of AI. It would require employers to disclose if AI was a factor in a mass layoff.\nSens. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Roger Marshall, R-Kan., are also co-sponsors of the legislation.\nHickenlooper, who serves as ranking member of the panel, said in support of the bill that “informed policy starts with good data.”\nHe also said he’s working on another bill that he said would bring together “regional partnerships of educators, industry and intermediaries to provide credentials, apprenticeships, other … jobs and training that use AI,” to take advantage of expertise in a region’s workforce needs.\nHickenlooper said the bill would increase communication about forecasts for workforce needs in the age of AI, as well as strategies to respond.\nEXPERTS WEIGH IN\nThe subcommittee heard from a panel of experts who underlined the need for better data and explained possible changes beyond the bill.\nCarol Rogers, director of the Indiana Business Research Center, offered her support for Banks’ bill and urged the committee to “create standards for the definitions so that we compare apples to apples” in measuring AI’s impact on the workforce.\nLiya Palagashvili, director of the Labor Policy Project at the Mercatus think tank at George Mason University, said that measurement systems should be “resilient across several possible futures.”\nShe said that data on AI in the labor market could be improved by “linking business surveys’ answers to actual hiring and wage outcomes” to allow comparisons based on whether a firm uses AI.\nShe also encouraged lawmakers to add occupational data to wage records reported by employers “so we can see which specific jobs are growing or shrinking.” She also requested a “timely measure of new solo independent business activity” to measure whether AI is increasing that type of work.\nThe panel experts largely downplayed concerns about mass unemployment, instead focusing on how AI could change the skills workers need and how they acquire them.\nPalagashvili said that “early evidence does not yet show broad AI-driven employment loss.”\nShe said that current data on jobs for young workers in fields most exposed to AI is “more consistent with slower hiring than with layoffs” and that some of the slowdown may have begun before the release of major generative AI models, indicating that the hiring changes could be caused by other economic factors.\nKen Clark, president and CEO of workforce investment group EmployIndy, said that “AI is reshaping far more jobs than it’s replacing.”\n“The greatest long-term workforce risk is not widespread unemployment,” Clark said. “It’s the disruption of career pathways that workers rely on to gain experience and continually develop new skills throughout their careers.”\nJustin Heck, senior director of research and data production for skills-based hiring advocacy group Opportunity@Work, said that AI could also “hollow out” midlevel positions by removing friction points where employees learn necessary skills to move up in the workforce.\n“A company that automates the demanding parts of jobs may see short-term efficiency gains while inadvertently dismantling the pipeline that produces its own future supervisors and managers,” Heck said.\n©2026 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.","confidence":0.9,"diagnostics_url":"/api/diagnose?url=https%3A//www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/federal-bill-would-probe-ais-use-focus-in-the-workplace","quality_bucket":"high","failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"quality_reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","quality_profile":{"profile_version":"extraction_quality.v2","bucket":"high","confidence":0.9,"failure_kind":"none","retryable":false,"retry_after_attempts":0,"reason":"High confidence: full text extraction produced 4698 characters.","operator_guidance":{"severity":"ok","recommended_action":"trust_full_text","next_step":"Use the extracted full text as the primary article source.","operator_label":"Ready","can_retry":false,"can_use_summary":false,"diagnostics_required":false},"content_depth":{"contract_version":"content_depth.v1","category":"full_text","label":"Full text","has_full_text":true,"has_summary":true,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382,"usable_text_length":4698,"source_field":"content"},"legacy_collapsed":false,"signals":{"extract_state":"ok","extract_error":null,"extract_retries":0,"content_length":4698,"summary_length":382}},"tags":[],"format_contract_version":"news_item_formats.v1"}}}